Unuevbo TV
"Nigeria Is Drifting Dangerously": Peter Obi Condemns NBC's 'Gag Order' on Broadcasters Ahead of 2027 Elections
A political firestorm has erupted over press freedom in Nigeria following a controversial advisory issued by the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC), with former presidential candidate Peter Obi issuing a stark warning that the nation is "drifting dangerously" towards authoritarianism. The NBC's April 17, 2026, directive, which threatens sanctions against broadcasters who express "personal opinions" or fail to maintain "neutrality" in their programming, has been met with fierce resistance from media unions, civil society organisations, and opposition figures who have roundly condemned it as a "veiled attempt to gag the media" and "institutionalise censorship" ahead of the 2027 general elections.
At the heart of the uproar is a fundamental question that cuts to the core of Nigeria's democratic health: where does the line lie between responsible regulation and outright censorship? And as the nation inches toward the 2027 general elections, is the NBC acting as a neutral arbiter of broadcast standards, or as a political instrument designed to silence dissent and control the national narrative? Obi's intervention, which came in a fiery statement posted to his verified X handle on Tuesday, has amplified the chorus of condemnation and placed the spotlight firmly on the Tinubu administration's commitment to democratic freedoms.
"Yesterday's Advocates of Democracy, Today's Oppressor of the Press"
In a statement that has resonated widely across the political spectrum, Peter Obi did not mince his words. Titling his post "Yesterday's Advocates of democracy, Today's Oppressor of the Press," the former Anambra State governor and African Democratic Congress (ADC) presidential hopeful warned that the NBC's latest move represents a dangerous escalation in the government's attempts to control the national narrative.
"The recent notice by the National Broadcasting Commission, especially at this critical time of the general elections, is very troubling," Obi wrote. "A free and responsible media should not be an enemy to any administration, especially one that claims to have fought for democracy. The media is the conscience of the nation. Attempting to stifle voices, moderate opinions, or intimidate journalists under the guise of regulation only weakens our already fragile democracy."
Obi's statement went beyond a simple critique of the NBC. It struck at the heart of what he perceives as a fundamental misdirection of governance priorities. "At a time when insecurity is on the rise, young Nigerians are losing faith in the country, and the economy continues to fail the average citizen, our focus should not be on controlling media narratives, but on delivering results," he argued.
The former Labour Party presidential candidate concluded with a powerful call to action, declaring his solidarity with media organisations and insisting that the country must "return to the path of transparency, accountability, and true independence of all arms and agencies of government." His final warning was unambiguous: "We cannot continue to endanger our democracy." He added the now-familiar refrain of his political movement: "A new Nigeria is possible."
"Nigeria Does Not Need Stronger Control. Nigeria Needs Stronger Institutions"
Perhaps the most quoted and resonant line from Obi's intervention was his assertion that "Nigeria does not need stronger control. Nigeria needs stronger institutions." This single sentence encapsulates a central theme of his political philosophy and speaks directly to the broader concerns about democratic backsliding that have animated public discourse in recent years.
Obi's emphasis on institutions over control reflects a deep-seated anxiety among pro-democracy advocates that Nigeria's regulatory bodies are being systematically weaponised to serve political ends. The NBC, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), and other oversight agencies have faced persistent accusations of being co-opted by the executive branch to suppress dissent and manipulate electoral outcomes. Obi's warning that "institutions are not built to serve governments; they are built to serve the people" is a direct challenge to this perceived erosion of institutional independence.
The timing of his remarks is significant. With the 2027 general elections looming on the horizon, the political landscape is already taking shape. President Bola Tinubu is expected to seek re-election on the platform of the All Progressives Congress (APC), while a formidable opposition coalition has coalesced around the African Democratic Congress (ADC). This coalition brings together heavyweights including Atiku Abubakar, Peter Obi himself, Rabiu Kwankwaso, Nasir el-Rufai, and Rotimi Amaechi—a development that has undoubtedly heightened political tensions.
A Chorus of Condemnation: Atiku, SERAP, Amnesty International Join the Fray
Obi is far from alone in his condemnation. The NBC's advisory has galvanised a broad coalition of opposition figures, civil society organisations, and international human rights groups, all of whom have raised alarm bells about the implications for press freedom and democratic governance.
Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar was among the first to react, describing the directive as "yet another troubling attempt to muzzle the media and shrink the space for free expression in Nigeria." In a post on his X handle on Saturday night, Atiku noted that Nigeria's media industry has evolved into a formidable institution respected globally, adding that it was "alarming" that the NBC often resorts to "heavy-handed directives" whenever elections draw near. "I stand firmly with Nigeria's broadcast industry and all media platforms resisting this creeping censorship," Atiku declared. He further argued that ethical standards in journalism should not be "seasonal tools to be weaponised during campaigns," adding that the timing and tone of the advisory suggest a "deeper agenda."
The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has taken an even more aggressive stance, issuing a 48-hour ultimatum to President Bola Tinubu to order the immediate withdrawal of the directive or face legal action. In a letter dated April 18, 2026, and signed by its Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, SERAP described the notice as "a dangerous attempt to impose prior censorship on the media and suppress legitimate journalistic expression." The organisation specifically criticised Section 1.10.3 of the Broadcasting Code, arguing that "this amounts to prior restraint that impermissibly excludes commentary, analysis, and value judgments—the core of journalism and democratic discourse."
Amnesty International has also weighed in forcefully. Isa Sanusi, Executive Director of Amnesty International Nigeria, stated that the directive imposes "unduly restrictive and invasive controls" on the media landscape and appears designed to pressure journalists into self-censorship. "The Nigerian authorities must stop using the NBC in an unrelenting quest to silence journalists and media organisations," Sanusi declared. The global rights organisation emphasised that Nigeria's broadcast media should enable people to "freely seek, debate, receive and impart information and ideas," as guaranteed by the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
NUJ: "The Media Is the Watchdog of Society, Not the Lapdog of Government"
The Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ) has offered perhaps the most comprehensive and scathing critique of the NBC directive. In a statement signed by its National Secretary, Achike Chude, the union described the notice as "nothing short of a veiled attempt to gag the media and institutionalise censorship."
The NUJ took particular issue with the NBC's position on anchors expressing personal opinions, describing it as "direct interference in the internal editorial processes of independent media houses." "Journalism, especially in current affairs and political analysis, requires robust engagement," the union stated. "To deny presenters the right to analyse and contextualise news is to reduce the media to a mere mouthpiece."
The union also raised concerns about the vagueness of the regulatory provisions, warning that classifying alleged infractions as "Class B" offences punishable by heavy fines or suspension creates a "climate of fear" that encourages self-censorship among journalists. "This regime of fear discourages journalists from asking hard questions for fear of being labelled unprofessional or hostile by a regulatory body that is increasingly perceived as a political tool," the NUJ stated.
Invoking Section 39 of the 1999 Constitution, which guarantees freedom of expression, the union declared: "The NBC Code cannot and must not be used to override the supreme law of the land." The statement concluded with a powerful affirmation of journalism's role in a democratic society: "The media is the watchdog of society, not the lapdog of the government or opposition. Any attempt to silence it is an attack on Nigeria's democracy."
The Other Side: Fidelis Mbah Defends NBC's Advisory
Amid the storm of criticism, a notable voice of dissent has emerged in defence of the NBC. Fidelis Mbah, Deputy President of the International Press Institute, has argued that the directive should be interpreted as a routine advisory rather than an attempt to suppress press freedom.
Speaking on ARISE News on Monday, Mbah maintained that the NBC's position aligns with established broadcasting standards, particularly the need for journalists to clearly distinguish between personal opinions and factual reporting. "If you are giving your personal opinion, you should be clear to say this is your opinion," he said. He also pointed to recurring issues within parts of the media ecosystem, particularly at the grassroots level, where some broadcasters engage in unverified claims, biased reporting, and inflammatory content. "Some of our colleagues have crossed the line," Mbah noted, adding that advisories like this serve as necessary checks to maintain professionalism across the industry.
While defending the directive as standard practice, Mbah acknowledged the growing public concern, especially given Nigeria's political climate and proximity to another election cycle. He explained that similar advisories are typically issued before elections to promote fairness, balance, and responsible broadcasting. "It's a routine practice… just that the timing has raised suspicion," he said. However, Mbah stressed that media organisations and press freedom advocates remain vigilant against any attempt to weaponise regulation against journalists. "Any attempt to stifle press freedom… we will come out to protect our colleagues," he added.
The Electoral Context: Why This Matters Now More Than Ever
The NBC's directive does not exist in a political vacuum. Nigeria is steadily approaching the 2027 general elections, and the political temperature is already rising. The ruling APC is expected to field President Bola Tinubu for re-election, while a formidable opposition coalition has coalesced around the ADC, bringing together Atiku, Obi, Kwankwaso, el-Rufai, and Amaechi.
Critics argue that the timing of the NBC's directive is far from coincidental. Atiku has explicitly accused the government of being "more interested in controlling the narrative than in ensuring a free, fair and transparent electoral process." The fear is that the regulatory body is being weaponised to silence dissenting voices and shape public discourse in favour of the incumbent administration.
The Nigerian media, historically a vibrant and influential force, has often found itself in the crosshairs of regulatory overreach during election cycles. From the infamous closure of media houses during previous military regimes to the more subtle forms of pressure exerted in the democratic era, the pattern is disturbingly familiar to many observers. The Centre for Information Technology and Development (CITAD) has warned that the absence of clarity in the NBC directive could lead to "arbitrary interpretation and enforcement," undermining press freedom and democratic engagement.
Conclusion: A Defining Moment for Nigerian Democracy
The controversy over the NBC's directive is about far more than a regulatory notice—it is a defining moment for press freedom and democratic accountability in Nigeria. The overwhelming response from Peter Obi, Atiku Abubakar, SERAP, Amnesty International, the NUJ, and a host of civil society organisations underscores a deep-seated anxiety about the shrinking civic space and the weaponisation of regulatory bodies for political ends.
Obi's warning that "Nigeria is drifting dangerously" is not hyperbole; it reflects a genuine concern that the democratic gains of the past two decades are being systematically eroded. His call for stronger institutions rather than stronger control resonates because it speaks to a fundamental truth: democracy cannot thrive in an environment where the media is silenced, and dissenting voices are suppressed.
Whether the government heeds the calls for withdrawal or presses forward with enforcement will send a powerful signal about its commitment to democratic norms. As SERAP's 48-hour ultimatum ticks down and legal challenges loom on the horizon, one thing is certain: Nigeria's media professionals and pro-democracy advocates are not backing down. As the NUJ so powerfully declared, "The media is the watchdog of society, not the lapdog of the government." The nation—and the world—is watching to see which path Nigeria will choose.
Stay tuned to Unuevbo TV for more in-depth reporting on Nigeria's media landscape, press freedom, and democratic governance.
© 2026 Unuevbo TV – All rights reserved. Republication only with permission.