Unuevbo TV

“Why Our WASSCE Paper No Start?” WAEC Blames Logistics, Security as Students, Parents Drag Council Online

📅 June 9, 2026 | ⏱️ 4 min read

✍️ This post was authored by Jefferson Ellams — Covering the annual examination chaos, the frustration of Nigerian students, and the institution that still cannot get papers to exam halls on time.

Thousands of WASSCE candidates were left waiting for hours on June 8, 2026, as question papers failed to reach examination centres across the country.

The examination hall was ready. The students were seated. Pencils sharpened. Hearts racing with the particular anxiety that only a WASSCE morning can produce. And then — nothing. For hours, across multiple states, the question papers did not arrive. It was June 8, 2026, and the West African Examinations Council had once again turned the most important morning of a student's academic life into a waiting game.

The Scene: Students Held Hostage by an Empty Desk

The reports flooded in from across the country. In Lagos, a student posted: "We dey hall since 8am, paper land 11:30am." In Kaduna, the rumour spread that bandits had intercepted the examination convoy. An Abuja parent wrote that her daughter had fainted at the centre from tension. In some locations, the morning paper was pushed to the afternoon. In others, students were simply told to go home. The hashtag #WAECExplain began to trend, and as always, it was part fury, part gallows humour — the coping mechanism of a generation that has learned to expect disappointment from the institutions meant to serve them.

WAEC's Response: Logistics, Security, and the Weather

WAEC issued a statement on the same day, confirming delays in "some locations." The reasons given were threefold. Logistics challenges: vehicle breakdowns, bad roads, late dispatch from custody centres. Security challenges: papers moving under armed escort in high‑risk areas, convoys delayed by threats, checkpoints, and security advisories. And then the weather: rain in some southern states had slowed movement. The council's spokesperson was careful to add that no leakage had occurred, that the integrity of the examination remained intact, and that the inconvenience was regretted.

The statement was technically competent. It was also, for anyone who has followed Nigerian education for more than a single cycle, a remix of the same song. In 2023, it was IPOB sit‑at‑home orders in Imo. In 2024, it was floods and fuel scarcity. In 2025, the national grid collapse delayed printing. Now, in 2026, it is logistics and security. The details change. The apology stays the same. And the question that parents and students are asking — the one WAEC never seems to answer — is why a 70‑year‑old institution still cannot solve a problem it has faced every single year.

Why Nigerians Are No Longer Accepting the "Annual Excuse"

The anger is sharper this year because the comparisons are now impossible to ignore. JAMB conducts the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination entirely on computers, with instant results, for millions of candidates. WAEC is still moving paper across a country where roads are unsafe and bandits operate with near impunity. Parents paying upwards of ₦27,000 per child are asking why the council cannot print papers by zone to reduce the risk of transit. Students who prepared their minds for a 9 a.m. examination and found themselves still waiting at midday are asking who will account for the performance gap that panic creates.

There is a deeper cost, too. University admission deadlines are tight. A delayed WAEC paper can cascade into a missed admission window. Some students risk losing an entire academic year — not because they failed, but because the examination body could not deliver. For families that have scraped together fees, transport money, and the emotional capital required to get a child through secondary school, the casualness of WAEC's "regret" feels like an insult.

The Reality Check

WAEC's security concerns are not imaginary. Examination custodians have been kidnapped before. Convoys have been attacked. In parts of the country, moving valuable documents is genuinely dangerous work. But that is not an excuse for a system that has refused to modernise. If banks can move cash with bullion vans and helicopters, WAEC can move papers — or better yet, stop moving papers altogether. A hybrid system, regional printing, or a phased transition to computer‑based testing are not radical ideas. They are survival strategies for an institution that is being left behind by the country it serves.

The students who sat in empty examination halls on June 8 will eventually write their papers. The results will be released. The ritual will repeat next year. But the patience of Nigerian families, stretched across years of avoidable crises, is not limitless. WAEC is not the only examination body in the world to face logistics and insecurity. It is, however, one of the few that continues to be defined by them.

Parents, teachers, students — was your centre affected on June 8? Should WAEC go fully computer‑based like JAMB, or is paper still the way? Drop your centre and your experience. Let us map the delays. And WAEC — if you are reading this, Nigerians want solutions, not statements.

📺 Watch Nigerian politics 24/7 on our Politics Channel.

📢 This post was authored by Jefferson Ellams
© 2026 Unuevbo TV – All rights reserved. Republication only with permission.

Unuevbo TV

“Report Terrorists to Who?” Tinubu’s Call to Nigerians Backfires as Citizens Demand Action, Not Speeches

📅 June 9, 2026 | ⏱️ 4 min read

✍️ This post was authored by Jefferson Ellams — Tracking the widening gap between presidential rhetoric and the lived experience of Nigerians under siege.

President Bola Tinubu's June 8 call for Nigerians to report terrorists and kidnappers was met with instant and brutal backlash across social media.

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu sat behind his desk in Abuja on June 8, 2026, dressed in dark navy agbada, and delivered a message that was meant to reassure. "Report terrorists. Report kidnappers. We will not allow bandits to define the lives of Nigerians." What followed was not applause. It was a torrent of anger so swift and so precise that it revealed, in a single afternoon, the abyss that now separates the presidency from the people it governs.

The Statement That Lit the Fire

The president's call was simple on its surface: citizens should provide intelligence, and his administration would act. It was the kind of civic appeal that leaders everywhere make in times of insecurity. But in Nigeria, in June 2026, it landed like a match on petrol. The reply from the street was immediate, and it was devastating. "Report to who? The same police wey dey collect ₦100 for checkpoint?" "Zamfara villagers report bandits daily. Dem still come back next market day." "My uncle reported kidnappers. He was killed next week. Who protects whistleblowers?"

This was not a protest. It was an inventory of betrayal. Nigerians have been reporting. They have submitted tips, videos, locations, photographs. They have done it for years — since Chibok, since Benue, since the Kaduna‑Abuja highway became a theatre of abduction. And the result, as far as they can see, has been silence, retaliation, or the quiet death of a file in a police station that nobody ever opens again. To ask them to "report" now is to ask them to believe in a system they have long stopped trusting.

Why This Hit Harder Than a Normal Speech

Timing is everything, and the president's statement arrived in the worst possible week. On June 5, Edo residents blocked bypasses with burning tyres, chanting that "government no dey do anything" about kidnapping. On the same day Tinubu was speaking, Oyo State was demolishing a kidnapper's den — an act of physical, visible force that made the presidential appeal for citizens to "report" feel flimsy by comparison. And in Abuja, a woman and three girls held placards that read: "I AM SCARED OF TAKING MY CHILDREN TO SCHOOL."

In that climate, "report them" did not sound like a strategy. It sounded like a president passing the burden back to the people his security apparatus has failed. As one X user posted, with the kind of brutal concision that defines Nigerian social media: "You have DSS, Army, Police, Air Force. But you want market woman to do your job?"

The Trust Gap That Speeches Cannot Bridge

This is not the first time President Tinubu has urged Nigerians to assist in the fight against insecurity. But three years into his presidency, the scorecard is being written in ransom payments, not press releases. Families are still crowdfunding millions on social media to free loved ones. The Benin‑Auchi and Abuja‑Kaduna roads remain routes that require prayer before departure. Parents are still protesting outside schools, holding placards that no parent should ever have to hold. When the president says "bandits will not define our lives," the honest reply from too many Nigerians is that they already do.

There are supporters who see the president's appeal differently. Intelligence is vital, they argue. Citizen tips have helped bust cells before. The president is engaging, not hiding. These are not unreasonable points. But they miss the central problem: reporting only works if response works. Until Nigerians trust that dialling 112 will not get them killed, ignored, or marked for reprisal, "report them" will continue to sound like "figure it out yourselves."

The president spoke from Abuja on June 8. The country replied in seconds. The question hanging in the air, as the dust settles on another week of abduction and anxiety, is whether the presidency is listening — not to the tips it asked for, but to the anger it received in return.

Have you ever reported a crime and seen action? Or is Tinubu asking too much from citizens with no protection? Share your experience — good or bad. The country is keeping its own records now.

📺 Watch Nigerian politics 24/7 on our Politics Channel.

📢 This post was authored by Jefferson Ellams
© 2026 Unuevbo TV – All rights reserved. Republication only with permission.

Unuevbo TV

Oyo Demolishes Kidnappers' Den: Adelabu Family Case Sparks Debate on Bulldozer Justice

📅 June 9, 2026 | ⏱️ 4 min read

✍️ This post was authored by Jefferson Ellams — Covering the heavy‑handed justice dividing opinion in Oyo State and the growing use of demolition as an anti‑kidnapping tool.

Oyo State officials demolished a bungalow used by kidnappers in Ibadan on June 8, 2026, triggering nationwide debate on the use of bulldozers as a crime‑fighting tool.

The excavator arrived in Lako Community, Aiyegun‑Anaye Road, on June 8, 2026, and before the afternoon was over, a modest bungalow had been reduced to rubble. The Oyo State Government had not issued a fine. It had not pasted a demolition notice. It had simply brought down the walls — and in doing so, it ignited a debate that is as much about justice as it is about the desperation of a country that has run out of patience with kidnappers.

The house was no ordinary property. According to the police, it was the den where the sister and twin sons of former Minister of Power Bayo Adelabu were held captive before their rescue. Adelabu, a former APC governorship candidate and ally of President Tinubu, is not a man whose family crisis goes unnoticed. The government's response, when it came, was swift, visual, and irreversible. The 2016 Oyo State anti‑kidnapping law — which mandates the demolition of any property used for abduction — was invoked, and the bungalow was gone.

The Bulldozer as a Message

For many Nigerians, the footage of that excavator smashing through the perimeter wall was cathartic. Social media filled with applause. "Finally, a government with guts. Demolish all of them," one comment read. Another was sharper: "Adelabu is a big man. Imagine if it was a poor man's family — they would do nothing." The demolition became an instant symbol of state power, a declaration that there would be no safe haven for kidnappers in Oyo.

It was not a press conference. It was not a statement issued on a letterhead. It was concrete and dust and the unmistakable message that Governor Seyi Makinde's administration is willing to wield a hard hand. In a state battling a surge in abductions, the demolition was a performance of strength. It was the government saying, in the most visible language possible: we will not negotiate with terror. We will erase it.

The Questions That Followed the Rubble

But the dust had barely settled before the critics began to speak. Legal observers pointed out that demolishing a crime scene before a full forensic investigation could destroy vital evidence — fingerprints, DNA, phone records, the invisible trail that leads to other kidnappers. "Was the investigation complete before the excavator moved in?" one lawyer asked on social media. Another added: "This is punishment before conviction. Even the law must wait for a trial."

The timing, too, raised eyebrows. The victims had already been rescued. The suspects were reportedly in custody. The house, by then, was evidence — not an active threat. To reduce it to rubble so quickly felt to some like a government that was more interested in the optics of justice than in its substance. The 2016 law was designed to deter, but critics argued that deterrence works best when convictions precede demolition, not the other way around.

Why This Demolition Hit Differently

Oyo is not the first state to bulldoze a kidnapper's den. Lagos and Anambra have done it before. But this incident carried unique weight. First, the victim's profile — Adelabu is a political heavyweight, connected to the highest levels of power. When elites are targeted, the state's reflexes sharpen. Second, the national mood has shifted. The June 5 protests in Edo, where residents blocked bypasses over rampant kidnappings, showed that ordinary Nigerians are no longer waiting for permission to express their anger. Third, the 2027 election is already casting its shadow. Makinde's administration is signalling that it is tough on crime, drawing a contrast with federal security failures — and doing so with an excavator that no press release can match.

The house is gone. The suspects are in custody. The twins and their mother are safe. But the real question remains unanswered: does bulldozer justice stop kidnapping, or does it simply give a traumatised public a moment of televised satisfaction? Intelligence, investigation, and prosecution are slow, unglamorous work. Bulldozers are fast. In a country exhausted by fear, fast often wins the argument — but it does not always win the war.

Your take, Nigeria? Demolish first, investigate later? Or is this the only language kidnappers understand? Landlords, how are you screening your tenants? Sound off.

📺 Watch Nigerian politics 24/7 on our Politics Channel.

📢 This post was authored by Jefferson Ellams
© 2026 Unuevbo TV – All rights reserved. Republication only with permission.

Unuevbo TV

600 Years Strong: Igarra Kingdom's Ubete Day Proves Edo Culture Still Governs Unity

📅 June 7, 2026 | ⏱️ 4 min read

✍️ This post was authored by Jefferson Ellams — Covering the ancient traditions, living history, and cultural festivals that remind Edo State who its people have always been.

HRH Oba Adeche Saiki II, the Otaru of Igarra, leading the Ubete Day celebration on June 5, 2026 — a festival rooted in a 600‑year‑old land treaty.

Before Nigeria. Before Edo State. Before the bypass protests and the fake kidnap videos and the endless noise of the present, there was Igarra — a small kingdom in what is now Akoko‑Edo Local Government Area — and a land treaty that has outlasted every government that has ever claimed authority over this soil. On June 5, 2026, that treaty turned 600 years old. And the people of Igarra celebrated it not with speeches, but with pounded yam. One bowl. Eaten together.

The Scene: One Bowl, One People

HRH Oba Adeche Saiki II, the Otaru of Igarra and Akuku land, stepped onto the royal palace grounds in full regalia. Around him gathered the five ruling houses of the kingdom. Sons and daughters of Igarra who had returned from Lagos, from Abuja, from London. The occasion was Ubete Day — rebranded by the Otaru as "Igarra Day" — and the central ritual was as ancient as the treaty itself.

The communal eating of pounded yam. Not from separate plates. Not from individual servings. One large bowl. Age group by age group, the people dipped their hands into the same pounded yam, into the same soup, eating together as their ancestors had done. The message, unchanged across six centuries: "You cannot fight a person you have eaten from the same bowl with." It is a philosophy older than any constitution, and on this day, it was still working.

The 600‑Year‑Old Receipt: How Igarra Got Its Land

Ubete is not merely a festival. It is a history lesson that has been passed down orally for 600 years. Around the 15th century, the first Otaru, HRH Ariwo Ovejijo, led a group of migrants from Idah in present‑day Kogi State into the land that is now Igarra. There, they met a people known as the Anafuas — described in oral tradition as "Pygmy‑like" aborigines already occupying the territory.

What followed was not war. It was a treaty. The leader of the Anafuas, a man named Uno, scooped up a handful of soil and handed it to Ovejijo. The gesture was unmistakable: this land is now yours. It is why Igarra is also called Etuno — "the land of Uno." Ubete Day 2026 did not simply commemorate this moment. It re‑enacted it. The Otaru's procession to the celebration grounds echoed Ovejijo receiving that handful of earth. The people of Igarra were not told their history. They walked inside it.

Why Ubete Day Matters in 2026

In the same week that Edo residents burned tyres on bypasses to protest kidnapping, and a TikToker was arrested for fabricating a kidnap hoax, Igarra offered an alternative script. It was not loud. It was not digital. But it was powerful. Three lessons emerged from the celebration that the rest of Edo — and Nigeria — would do well to study.

First, conflict resolution without violence. Six hundred years ago, migrants and natives used soil and diplomacy, not bloodshed, to share land. In a country where ethnic tension is still the default setting, Igarra's origin story is a masterclass in peace. Second, culture as development policy. The Otaru himself drew the connection, describing unity as "the cornerstone of development." Investors do not flock to divided communities. They go where the social fabric is intact. Igarra, by annually reinforcing its own bonds, is doing the kind of work that no government agency can replicate.

Third, the diaspora homecoming model. The sons and daughters of Igarra who returned for Ubete Day brought with them tourism income, remittance flows, and a form of soft power that cannot be bought. Every festival that pulls the diaspora back to the homeland is an economic engine disguised as a party. Other LGAs should be taking notes.

Akoko‑Edo Is Not Just Crisis

When you search for "Akoko‑Edo" in the news, you are likely to find the Egbetua‑Ososo cement crisis, the ₦1.5 billion dispute, the headlines about violence. Ubete Day offers a counter‑narrative. It says this is also a place of treaty‑makers, of kingdom‑builders, of people who were organised long before the British arrived with their amalgamation papers. It is a reminder that the identity of a people is not defined by the worst thing that happens to them, but by the traditions they refuse to let die.

In a week where Edo debated whether flyovers should be classified as tourist sites, Igarra quietly demonstrated what authentic heritage tourism looks like. There was no government press release. No carefully edited campaign video. Just a palace, its people, and a bowl of pounded yam that has been feeding unity for 600 years.

What is your community's own "land story"? Which ancient festival in your LGA deserves to trend next? Tag your local government. Tell us your history. Let us make our roots louder than our crises.

📺 Watch Nigerian politics 24/7 on our Politics Channel.

📢 This post was authored by Jefferson Ellams
© 2026 Unuevbo TV – All rights reserved. Republication only with permission.

Unuevbo TV

"Aza Woman" Arrested: Edo Police Nab TikToker Over Fake Green Park Academy Kidnap Hoax

📅 June 7, 2026 | ⏱️ 3 min read

✍️ This post was authored by Jefferson Ellams — Covering the dangerous intersection of social media panic and real insecurity in Edo State.

TikToker Uzebor Emmanuel, known as "Aza Woman," was arrested on June 6 for spreading a fabricated kidnapping story that sent parents into a frenzy.

On June 6, 2026, a TikTok video lit a match under a state already drenched in fear. Uzebor Emmanuel, popularly known as "Aza Woman," posted a chilling claim: six students had been kidnapped from Green Park Academy and Western Boys' College. The video spread like floodwater. Parents raced to schools. Principals locked gates. Voice notes claimed children were being pulled from classrooms. There was just one problem: none of it happened.

The Arrest That Followed

By the end of the same day, the Edo State Police Command had picked up Aza Woman. Police PRO Eno Ikoedem did not hold back: "She deliberately spread a fabricated story about mass kidnapping. This is not content. This is panic. Misinformation erodes security confidence." The charge is spreading false information capable of causing public unrest — a serious offence in a state where real kidnappers are still on the prowl, and where residents had blocked bypasses just 24 hours earlier in protest against actual abductions.

Why This Hoax Hit Harder Than Most

Fake news is not new. But this one landed at the worst possible moment. Edo's nerves were already raw after the June 5 protests. Targeting schools triggered a unique terror — nothing panics a community faster than the thought of its children in harm's way. And the medium — TikTok and Instagram Reels — ensured the lie outpaced the truth. One parent told local blogs: "We no know wetin to believe again. Real kidnap dey, fake kidnap dey. All of them dey kill us."

The arrest signals a hardening posture from authorities. The message to influencers is blunt: clout-chasing with falsehoods now comes with handcuffs. To parents, the police have a simpler message: verify with school authorities before hitting the share button. In a state where genuine SOS calls compete with manufactured ones, the line between vigilance and hysteria has become dangerously thin.

What do you think? Should fake news spreaders face jail, fines, or public apologies? And how do you filter the information you share? Let us know.

📺 Watch Nigerian politics 24/7 on our Politics Channel.

📢 This post was authored by Jefferson Ellams
© 2026 Unuevbo TV – All rights reserved. Republication only with permission.

Unuevbo TV

"We Don Block Bypass": Edo Residents Shut Down Benin, Auchi Roads Over Kidnapping Terror

📅 June 7, 2026 | ⏱️ 4 min read

✍️ This post was authored by Jefferson Ellams — Reporting on the grassroots explosion of anger that brought Edo's busiest roads to a halt and forced the kidnapping crisis back onto the political agenda.

Burning tyres and wooden barricades across the Benin and Auchi bypasses on June 5, as residents brought traffic to a standstill to protest escalating kidnappings.

Edo State took its pain to the asphalt on June 5, 2026. From Benin City to Auchi, ordinary residents — traders, drivers, students — dragged burnt tyres, wooden planks, and their own bodies across the bypasses and refused to let a single vehicle pass. Their message was as direct as it was desperate: if the government cannot protect us, then the road itself will be the price.

The Scene: Tires, Wood, and Fury

The images that flooded social media on Thursday were the kind that make a government's communications team reach for a crisis playbook. A silver SUV, a white sedan — both halted mid‑journey, their occupants staring at the barricades and the crowd beyond. The chants, delivered in raw Pidgin, were aimed squarely at those in power. "Kidnapping too much for Edo State. Government no dey do anything. Today we say no movement!"

Protesters looked directly into smartphone cameras, naming names. "This is Benin bypass. We block am. Make Okpebholo see. Make Tinubu see." The blockade was not spontaneous. It was the accumulation of months of fear that had finally found a release valve. The Jaro‑Agbor Park‑Ikpobahill kidnapping corridor, now a permanent fixture on WhatsApp broadcasts, had transformed from a series of isolated incidents into a community trauma. Students had been targeted. Families had paid millions in ransom. The police had become a punchline. The bypass blockade was the answer to all of it.

Why Edo Snapped

To understand June 5, you must understand the months that preceded it. The Auchi‑Benin road had become a no‑go zone after 6 p.m. The Benin‑Agbor highway had earned a similar reputation. Fake abduction rumours, such as the one that swept through Green Park Academy, had fed a fear that was already real. The ransom economy had ballooned, and the official response — "come tomorrow" — had hollowed out whatever trust remained between the people and the security apparatus.

The protest was not simply about kidnapping. It was about a government that had spent the preceding week promoting a glossy video of the governor inspecting a hospital and a university in Udomi, under the banner "A NEW EDO HAS RISEN." For the residents on the bypass, the slogan was an insult. A new Edo had not risen for them. For them, the old Edo — the one of fear, ransom, and abandonment — was still very much alive.

The Political Shrapnel

The barricades did not discriminate. Governor Monday Okpebholo caught the brunt of the anger, with protesters demanding he bring the same energy he had shown at the Udomi tour to the insecurity crisis. Former Governor Godwin Obaseki was not spared; some banners blamed his eight years for "handing over bandits." President Bola Tinubu, watching from Abuja, was told bluntly: "You dey Abuja, we dey die here."

Opposition voices amplified the videos within hours. Pro‑government accounts called the protests "sponsored." The response from the street was immediate and brutal: "Sponsor yourself enter bush with kidnappers then." It was the kind of retort that cannot be answered by a press release.

What Happens After the Tires Cool

By evening, security forces had cleared most of the barricades and traffic was moving again. But the deeper damage had been done. Transporters have now unofficially shortened their operating hours, pulling off the road by 4 p.m. on affected routes. Markets are closing earlier. The government's own response — arresting a TikToker for spreading fake news the following day — only deepened the sense that the state was more interested in fighting perception than fighting kidnappers.

The June 5 protests are not just a security incident. They are an early campaign message for 2027, written not by any political party, but by the people who burn tyres because they have run out of options. Any politician who cannot present a credible security plan between now and the general election will find the bypasses waiting for them.

Blocking roads hurts traders, drivers, and the sick who cannot get to hospital. The protesters know this. Their response is already written in the same Pidgin that carried the chants: "We dey suffer already. At least now una dey hear us."

Your take, Edo? Was June 5 "security awareness" or "self‑sabotage"? If you were stuck in that traffic, who did you blame — the kidnappers or the government? Sound off, and if you have video from your area, share it. We are tracking every LGA.

📺 Watch Nigerian politics 24/7 on our Politics Channel.

📢 This post was authored by Jefferson Ellams
© 2026 Unuevbo TV – All rights reserved. Republication only with permission.

Unuevbo TV

"A New Edo Has Risen?" Gov Okpebholo's Udomi Project Tour Divides Edo Internet

📅 June 7, 2026 | ⏱️ 4 min read

✍️ This post was authored by Jefferson Ellams — Covering the politics of governance, the optics of development, and the battle for public perception in Edo State.

Gov Monday Okpebholo during the June 6 inspection tour of Udomi projects that has split Edo public opinion.

Governor Monday Okpebholo stepped out of his convoy in Udomi, Esan Central Local Government Area, on June 6, 2026, wearing a pink-striped polo shirt and a blue cap — and within hours, Edo State's internet was split in two. The official recap video from the Edo New Media & Visual Communications Office landed with a tagline that was always going to provoke: "A NEW EDO HAS RISEN." It did. Some saw it as proof of work. Others saw it as provocation.

Four Projects, One Community

The tour was designed to showcase four mega projects, all in Udomi. The Edo Specialist Hospital, a 150‑bed facility already treating patients, was the centrepiece — a functioning health asset in a state where a government delivering on healthcare is political currency. The Udomi University is rising from the ground. A 500‑hectare community farm and a holiday resort centre rounded out the itinerary. For the governor, the optics were clear: this is what delivery looks like. No memos. No press releases. Boots on the ground, with cameras.

The response from supporters was swift. "At least we're seeing our money," one comment read. Another: "Hospital, university, farm, resort — that's development, not audio." For the Esan heartland, the tour felt like validation, a visible return on political loyalty. The Specialist Hospital, in particular, became the poster child for an administration eager to tie its legacy to concrete and bedsheets, not just promises.

The Pushback: "Na Only Udomi Be Edo?"

But the internet never agrees on anything. The same video that earned applause also drew sharp criticism. "Edo State has 18 LGAs. Why is everything in Udomi?" one critic asked. Others demanded to see Auchi, Benin City, Etsako — any of the other communities that make up the state. The concentration of four major projects in one locality, all released in a single media push, made the opposition's job easy. Accusations of a "one‑LGA agenda" spread as quickly as the praise.

Even some of the governor's supporters conceded that the optics could fuel political narratives that will echo all the way to the 2028 governorship race. The slogan "A NEW EDO HAS RISEN" was shared as both praise and meme, depending on which side of the argument you stood. For a government that has cast itself as the antidote to neglect, the risk is that the project becomes a story about exclusion rather than delivery.

What the Tour Means Beyond Udomi

June 6 was more than an inspection. It was Okpebholo's most cinematic media push yet, a deliberate shift from governance by communiqué to governance by visual storytelling. The pink‑striped polo has already entered the state's political iconography. The projects themselves — some completed, some still under construction — are now baked into the governor's legacy narrative, whether the APC or the opposition is telling the story.

But the episode also exposes the tension inherent in development politics. Concentrating projects in one area creates a powerful visual case, but it also arms political opponents with a simple, devastating question: what about the rest of us? As the videos continue to circulate and the 2027 election season gathers pace, Udomi will remain both a symbol of what this administration says it is building — and a test of whether the rest of Edo believes it.

What's your take? Is Udomi the new model city for Edo, or should other LGAs start demanding their own tour? Share your thoughts — and stay tuned to Unuevbo TV for more on the politics of development in Edo State.

📺 Watch Nigerian politics 24/7 on our Politics Channel.

📢 This post was authored by Jefferson Ellams
© 2026 Unuevbo TV – All rights reserved. Republication only with permission.