Unuevbo TV
"At Large": FG Files 13-Count Treason Charge Against Ex-Minister Timipre Sylva, Five Others Over Alleged Coup Plot
The Federal Government has taken the extraordinary step of filing a sweeping 13-count treason charge against a former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, a retired Major General, a retired Naval Captain, a serving police inspector, and three civilians over their alleged involvement in a plot to overthrow the administration of President Bola Tinubu. The charge, marked FHC/ABJ/CR/206/2026 and filed on April 20, 2026, at the Federal High Court in Abuja, accuses the defendants of a dizzying array of offences ranging from treason and terrorism to failure to disclose security intelligence and money laundering linked to terrorism financing. The case, which has sent shockwaves through Nigeria's political establishment, represents the most serious legal action against high-profile figures for an alleged coup attempt since the country's return to democratic rule in 1999.
At the centre of the storm is Chief Timipre Sylva, the former Governor of Bayelsa State who served as Minister of State for Petroleum Resources from 2019 to 2023 under former President Muhammadu Buhari. In a detail that has added a layer of intrigue and urgency to the proceedings, court documents list Sylva as being "at large"—a fugitive from justice who will be tried in absentia unless apprehended. Reports indicate that the Federal Government has activated the International Police (INTERPOL) to track down the former minister and extradite him back to Nigeria to face the full weight of the law.
The Charges: A Web of Treason, Terrorism, and Money Laundering
The 13-count charge, filed by the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation and signed by the Director of Public Prosecutions of the Federation, Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), paints a chilling picture of a coordinated conspiracy to undermine the Nigerian state. At its core is the allegation that the defendants "conspired with one another to levy war against the state to overawe the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria"—an offence punishable under Section 37(2) of the Criminal Code. The charge explicitly names Colonel Mohammed Alhassan Ma'aji as the alleged ringleader of the coup plot, with prosecutors asserting that the defendants had prior knowledge of his "treasonable act" but failed to alert the appropriate authorities. The charge states that they, "knowing that a person intended to commit treason, did not give the information thereof with all reasonable despatch to either the President… or a peace officer."
But the allegations extend far beyond treason. The Federal Government is also prosecuting the defendants for terrorism-related offences under the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022. The charge alleges that they "conspired with one another to commit an act of terrorism in the Federal Republic of Nigeria." Specifically, Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim and Zekeri Umoru—an electrician working at the Presidential Villa—are accused of participating in meetings linked to terrorist activities. Prosecutors claim they acted "in a bid to further a political ideology which may seriously destabilise the constitutional structure of the Federal Republic of Nigeria." The charge also accuses the defendants of providing support for terrorism, alleging that they "knowingly and indirectly rendered support" to facilitate acts of terror.
Perhaps most damning are the financial allegations. The charge traces millions of naira in transactions allegedly linked to terrorism financing. Bukar Kashim Goni is alleged to have "indirectly retained the aggregate sum of N50,000,000, which forms part of the proceeds of an unlawful act, to wit: terrorism financing." Abdulkadir Sani, an Islamic cleric, allegedly retained N2 million from a similar source. Zekeri Umoru, according to the charge, "without going through a financial institution, accepted a cash payment of N10,000,000" and also retained an additional N8.8 million suspected to be proceeds of terrorism financing. Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim was also accused of taking possession of N1 million linked to the same alleged scheme. All financial-related counts were brought under the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.
The Accused: A Diverse Cast of Alleged Conspirators
The six defendants scheduled for arraignment on April 22 before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik represent a striking cross-section of Nigerian society. They include retired Major General Mohammed Ibrahim Gana, whose presence on the charge sheet underscores the gravity of the allegations and raises uncomfortable questions about the involvement of senior military figures in anti-democratic activities. Also named are retired Naval Captain Erasmus Ochegobia Victor; Inspector Ahmed Ibrahim, a serving police officer; Zekeri Umoru, an electrician working at the Presidential Villa; Bukar Kashim Goni, a civilian; and Abdulkadir Sani, an Islamic cleric.
The inclusion of a Presidential Villa employee among the accused is particularly alarming, suggesting that the alleged plot may have had tentacles reaching into the very heart of the nation's seat of power. According to the charge, the defendants acted as a coordinated network involving security personnel, civilians, and a politically exposed person in the person of Sylva. The Defence Headquarters has also confirmed that 16 military officers linked to related allegations will face a separate special court-martial, though it remains unclear whether these charges are in addition to the civilian prosecutions or part of a parallel process.
Sylva: The Fugitive Former Minister
Timipre Sylva's status as a fugitive has transformed an already dramatic case into a full-blown political saga. The former Bayelsa governor, who served as petroleum minister from 2019 to 2023 and governed the oil-rich southern state from 2007 to 2012, has consistently denied any links to a coup plot. After his Abuja residence was ransacked by investigators in October 2025, his spokesman stated that the former minister was in the United Kingdom for a medical check-up and described the allegations as politically motivated. An arrest warrant was subsequently issued for him in a separate case launched by the country's anti-corruption agency.
According to multiple sources, Sylva is alleged to have been the "arrowhead and financier" of the plot, providing critical funding and logistical support to the conspirators. The prosecution's case suggests that his position as a former high-ranking government official gave him both the access and the resources to play a central coordinating role. With INTERPOL now reportedly activated to secure his extradition, Sylva faces the prospect of being forcibly returned to Nigeria to stand trial for crimes that carry the ultimate penalty—treason is a capital offence under Nigerian law.
From Denial to Arraignment: A Timeline of Shifting Narratives
The road to Wednesday's arraignment has been marked by months of official denials, shifting narratives, and growing public pressure. Rumours of a coup plot first surfaced in October 2025 when the government abruptly cancelled a planned military parade to mark Nigeria's 65th Independence Anniversary. At the time, officials cited security threats, but speculation quickly linked the cancellation to a possible coup attempt. The Defence Headquarters (DHQ) initially dismissed the reports as concerning "routine disciplinary actions," with a spokesman stating that detained officers were being held over issues bordering on "indiscipline and breach of service regulations." The retired Brigadier-General further claimed that "investigations have revealed that their grievances stemmed largely from perceived career stagnation caused by repeated failure in promotion examinations."
But that narrative collapsed in January 2026, when the military finally acknowledged the existence of an ouster plot and announced that 16 officers would be tried before a military court for attempting to overthrow the president. The families of the detained officers had grown increasingly desperate, staging a protest at the National Assembly on April 1, 2026, to demand a speedy trial. "We are here to plead with the government to please charge our husbands to court," said Nana, the wife of one detainee. "We are not saying they should just be released like that. Necessary action should be done. But since the government said it has evidence against them, they should be charged to court. This is because they are innocent until proven guilty."
Political Undertones and Calls for Due Process
The case is unfolding against a politically charged backdrop. Sylva is a prominent figure in the All Progressives Congress (APC) and contested the 2023 Bayelsa State governorship election. His supporters have long maintained that the allegations against him are politically motivated, designed to sideline a potential rival or settle scores within the party. The former minister himself has denied any involvement, with his camp describing the charges as a witch-hunt.
Yet even some of Sylva's fellow Bayelsans have urged that the legal process be allowed to run its course without political interference. Joseph Ambakederimo, a respected Bayelsa elder, offered a measured perspective that captures the delicate balance the judiciary must now strike. "If anyone runs foul of the law, he should face the consequences of his actions in a competent court of law," Ambakederimo said. "This trial should not be politicised… the court should be allowed to do its work to its logical conclusion." His words reflect a broader sentiment: that the integrity of Nigeria's democratic institutions—and the principle that no one is above the law—must be upheld, regardless of the political stature of the accused.
What's at Stake: Democracy's Fragile Gains
The treason charges filed against Sylva and his co-defendants represent far more than a single criminal case. They are a test of Nigeria's democratic resilience—a measure of whether the institutions built since 1999 can withstand the centrifugal forces of political intrigue, military adventurism, and the ever-present temptation to resolve disputes outside the constitutional order. Nigeria has experienced a period of unbroken civilian rule for over a quarter of a century, and the armed forces have consistently stressed their loyalty to civilian authority, often issuing public statements reaffirming their commitment to democracy. But the very existence of an alleged coup plot involving senior military figures and a former minister serves as a sobering reminder that these gains are neither permanent nor guaranteed.
The trial, expected to commence in earnest after Wednesday's arraignment, will be closely watched by domestic and international observers alike. The prosecution faces the formidable task of proving beyond reasonable doubt that the defendants conspired to levy war against the state—a charge that carries the gravest of consequences. The defence, meanwhile, will likely challenge the credibility of the evidence, the circumstances of the defendants' detention, and the motivations behind the charges. Under Nigerian law, treason is one of the most serious criminal offences and can attract severe penalties, including life imprisonment.
Conclusion: A Defining Moment for the Rule of Law
As Justice Joyce Abdulmalik presides over the arraignment of the six defendants, Nigeria finds itself at a crossroads. The case will test not only the strength of the prosecution's evidence but also the independence of the judiciary and the government's commitment to due process. The presence of a former minister among the accused—and his status as a fugitive—adds layers of complexity that will challenge the legal system's capacity to deliver justice without fear or favour.
The families of the detained officers, who pleaded for a speedy trial, have now received their wish. But the path ahead is fraught with uncertainty. Will the prosecution's case hold up under judicial scrutiny? Will Sylva be extradited to face the charges against him? And perhaps most importantly, will the trial be conducted with the transparency and fairness that a democracy demands? The answers to these questions will reverberate far beyond the walls of the Federal High Court in Abuja. They will shape public confidence in Nigeria's democratic institutions and signal to potential future plotters whether the cost of attempting to subvert the constitutional order is one they are willing to pay. For now, the nation watches and waits as the wheels of justice begin to turn.
Stay tuned to Unuevbo TV for more in-depth reporting on Nigeria's national security, political developments, and the rule of law.
© 2026 Unuevbo TV – All rights reserved. Republication only with permission.